More and more draconian laws are being proposed and passed to address the â€œproblem of global warmingâ€, in spite of the fact that increasing numbers of scientists, and I mean a lot of scientists, are denouncing the lack of true science and data behind the global warming/ greenhouse emissions warnings we are hearing about daily from politicians (yeah, the experts!) and, particularly, the UN. See this article from World Net Daily about The Petition Project(link), a movement to expose the lie of global warming from a scientistâ€™s point of view.
So why do we hear all these politicians and political bodies preaching this doomsday message? The answer is in their proposed solutions. See this on a proposed carbon tax by a Canadian politician. Also, look at all the carbon tax initiatives to discourage people from creating carbon. Notice that companies can buy carbon â€˜creditsâ€™. It is all about money for governments, and that means money and control for politicians and political entities such as the UN. Right now there are those who are proposing a carbon tax on having children, as the children will make more carbon. See the article by Patrick Goodenough here, where he quotes Barry Walters, clinical associate professor of obstetric medicine at the University of Western Australia saying:
“Every newborn baby in Australia represents a potent source of greenhouse gas emissions for an average of 80 years, not simply by breathing, but by the profligate consumption of resources typical of our society,” he wrote in an article published in the Medical Journal of Australia Monday.
“Far from showering financial booty on new mothers and thereby rewarding greenhouse-unfriendly behavior, a ‘Baby Levy’ in the form of a carbon tax should apply, in line with the ‘polluter pays’ principle,” he argued.
Goodenough also noted that Walters:
calculated that a birth levy of around $4,380 (5,000 Australian dollars) would cover the cost of purchasing the land needed and planting the trees required to offset one lifetime’s worth of CO2. An additional annual tax of $350-$700 would cover maintenance of the forest.
Never mind that these children will grow up to be taxpayers, and will also be taxed for having children. A tax to be born â€“ brilliant!
The politicos have found the perfect tax scheme, since you cannot even live on the planet without creating carbon. In other words â€“ these are taxes on breathing. The UN had a committee â€œinterpretâ€ the findings of their panel of scientists to get the result they wanted. They didnâ€™t bother to ask those same UN scientists if the committeeâ€™s conclusions were correct, as it didnâ€™t matter. Remember, this is about money and control, not truth and certainly not about the health of our planet. Many other scientists have stated that the increase in CO2 levels will actually be beneficial.
Why, then, you might ask, do we hear from all the major media outlets that the global warming/climate change/carbon emissions are proven to be directly linked? To answer that you will need to first ask who owns the major media outlets. These people want you to fall for this all-important reason for you to be taxed like never before, and their talking heads are going to parrot what they are told to by their bosses in order to keep their high salaries. $$$ The love of money (power) is the root of all evil. Follow the money. Businesses must make a certain profit or they will fail. If their taxes go up your cost of living will have to go up, and on top of that you may have to pay a direct tax yourself to justify the way you live.
The politicians are absolutely giddy.